Madoff Was A Piker — America’s Big Banks Are a Far Larger Fraudulent Ponzi Scheme | Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace | AlterNet


Moyers Journal: Madoff Was A Piker — America's Big Banks Are a Far Larger Fraudulent Ponzi Scheme | Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace | AlterNet.

I have said this for years. To have believed all the hype over the last fifteen years one would have to believe in magic. Most of the wealth in this country as calculated by the dollar value of all notional currency is inherently false. Call it inflation, call it fraud, it is not real. All pension plans derive their ability to pay from current production regardless of notional contributions. We have an 18th century cash drawer mentality for a economy that is mismatched to that era’s ethos. If that fundamental contridiction is not addressed we will revist this again, the burst bubble, and want in a land of plenty.

Agence Global – Article


Agence Global – Article.

Change comes though no one desires it, and though few predicted its path.

Dollar Hegemony Imperilled


America, albeit not all Americans, have benefited from the Dollar as the world reserve currency. The organizational structures and peace that follwed WW2 by definition favored the US. That other nations benefited too, is indisputable yet we benefited most: and many nations suffered under that regime. It may be past time that the post WW2 system can be saved, if that is the case, it is a certainty that it is all the US;s own fault. More and more people and politicians are becoming aware and interested in a solution to the situation. Here is an article in that regard. Suffice to say that military adventurism, and a complete lack of fiscal prudence over a long time brought us here. And lets not blame Keynes, who like Adam Smith and many other thinkers had their theories and writings reduced to some flippant maxim.

Marching Thru Georgia


The conflict in Georgia as described in the news is without context or background. First, here’s a linguistic map of the area.

The Ossetian’s are culturally related to Persians, the Georgians are Orthodox Christians. The Ossetia’s and Georgians have not gotten along, for a very long time, going back to the wars between Rome/Byzantium and Parthia/Persia. So, this goes way back, old old hatreds. Russian troops have done in Ossetia, the same thing we have done in Kosovo. Just as Tibetans want to be free of China, Ossetian’s want to be free of Georgians. As do the Abkhaz people, in the other area of “Georgia” that wants self government. The Ossetia’s know independence is unsustainable, but they prefer the remote and light hand of Russia to the close and heavy hand of Georgia. Let it go.

Georgia is physically as close to Russia as Cuba is to the U.S. The Russians appreciate our interference in Georgia probably as much as we appreciate their interference in Cuba. The United States has no national interests in Georgia; Russia does. Push comes to shove, we won’t go to war for Georgia and should therefore not indicate or imply that we would, it makes the Georgian’s take excessive risks. The oil pipeline doesn’t rise to a national interest of ours, it was never realistic to begin with, because it was predicated on a straight line graph prediction that Russia would remain at the nadir of power similar to the late 90’s.

Straight line predictions are almost never right, and Russia was bound to recover, as it has done before. Students of Russian history know that in 1917, Russia government collapsed the country fell apart in chaos, revolution and civil war. Twenty Eight years later in 1945 they were the greatest land power on the planet. They had beaten the vaunted German Wehrmacht and planted their flags in nine capital cities. They conquered Manchuria and Korea, a territory as large as Western Europe in around three weeks. This easily surpasses the early Wehrmacht success in Poland and France. And they stopped. And they proved reasonable over Finland. Russia will have Abkhazia and Ossetia, the real question is will they have Georgia proper too. Russia wins any fight over that.

We Americans need to take stock, of our true national interests and the real world. The nonsensical chest thumping since the fall of the USSR has cost us a lot. Missed opportunities, unproductive ill will, diminution of goodwill, and failure. The fall of the USSR and its meaning has not sunk in too many in the U.S., I’m looking at you Dick Cheney, but that is its own blog topic. Our attempts to apply a different standard to our actions than the actions of other countries is pointless feel good rhetoric. Our national geographic and historical ignorance serve us ill. NATO has got to pull back to Western European countries only, in this I include the Baltic States, Finland, Poland, Hungary, Slovakia, and Croatia, and exclude Turkey and Greece. See, the funny thing is we are actually less powerful, not more powerful with the USSR gone. Against the USSR/East bloc we could assert ourselves with cheap nukes. Against a chaotic world, we can only assert ourselves with infantry, and we don’t have nearly enough, not remotely. The stink of our foreign policy failures is rife. Let’s not further add to the list.

The Legacy of President Wilson


Wilson’s legacy is multi-faceted, with each of the pieces bad. 1. Going to war without a vital interest at stake. 2. Elevating abstract ideals, over real world empiricism. 3. Double-think: expanding segregation while speaking of national self determination, democracy, and freedom. 4. Unconstitutional imprisonment and silencing of dissenters. 5. Refusing to acknowledge failure, as though reality can be influenced in such a manner. There is more, but time and space are limited. The current President comes right out of the Wilsonian vision, or as I call it, delusion: John McCain too. Barack Obama seems a practical man, a pragmatist and an optimist too. Time will tell.

My definitions of the four cardinal political positions, and a complaint


Conservatism: The idea that obligation is one way and flows from the individual to societal organs.

Liberalism: The idea that obligation is one way flowing from societal organs to the individual.

Libertarianism: The idea that there are no obligations at all.

communitarianism: The idea that obligation is reciprocal and dynamic.

There is much discussion in Western political thought of rights, as though they exist separate and apart from the real world in an abstract and ideal state, and become sullied by reality. The fact is there are no natural rights. In nature successful reproduction is all that counts. No creature of the wild is as foolish as man, to think it is entitled to anything.

Yet we crave assurance. We wish to be fed though we grow no food. We wish to have shelter though we construct no building. We wish to be clothed though we make none. Economic productivity has reached such an unheard of rarefied prosperity that we are lost: mentally and emotionally lost in obsolete ways of thinking and behaving. In times of shortage it makes sense to take actions that become ludicrous in times of plenty. We have a pre-industrial way of allocating resources and managing governance with an economy that spews out finished goods in historically unimaginable quantities, and allows for instant communication, also historically unimaginable. And we are miserable with pointless work and stress, frightened of bogeymen that will take this prosperity away, and ignorant about ourselves and world. Our greatest injuries are self inflicted. Our current political system and mindset in America are our problem. Like Rome, and the other great states of the past our enemies are ourselves, and the outsiders can only hurt us once we have weakened ourselves.

I am so weary of the vacuous and dumb rhetoric that passes for political discourse in our age. It is cold comfort that most of the world is more screwed up than are we. At our founding some very reasonable men did a remarkably good job of fashioning a political solution, why can’t we? We must get rid of the idolification of the Constitution, and get rid of the dead hand o the priesthood like vested interests that grasp to themselves decision making authority.

We need a new government.

Bishop Joseph Butler said:


“Things and actions are what they are, and the consequences of them will be what they will be: why then, should we desire to be deceived?”